I hate to disappoint those who still think PMTS is only about Carving. We like to carve yes, but we also like to ski many other ways in powder, bumps and steeps. All these ways have to do with releasing and tilting.
Harald, any turn on skis, regardless of the variety, must have tilting to initiate and release to conclude. A ski will not change its direction of travel if it's not tilted and allowed to engage, it will just follow the falline to the bottom of the hill. And it won't stop changing direction if that engagement is not released. You're really not saying anything of significance here.
I think most instructors beleive there are only two ways to make turns, steering which leads to skidding and tipping which leads to carving. Those that have that thinkning are limited in their appoaches and understanding.
A carving ski is a ski that has been tilted to engage the sidecut, then is allowed to track unabated along a course dictated by that sidecut. There are many ways to alter the turn radius created by that sidecut, but the ski is only carving if the entire length of the edge continues to track over a common point.
As soon as a divergence occurs, as soon as the tip and tail begin to track along a different paths, carving has been aborted. When a divergence of that nature happens a disconnect between the direction the ski's pointing and the direction it's traveling occurs. If the ski is indeed pressured this divergence immediately introduces a degree of sliding.
For such a divergence to occur a supplimental force sufficient to overcome the skis natural tendancy to follow its sidecut, or if unpressured to alter its directional orientation, must be introduced. Only three types of forces can make that occur; a rotational force that acts to twist the ski out of it's natural carve, as occurs during steering, a rotational force that acts to redirect the skis during the light phase of the transition, or a lateral force that impacts one section of the ski more that the another. Unless you're suggesting that you can overcome the laws of physics the supplimental force you employing must fall into one of these three catagories.
Accordingly, if you're correct in your contention that you're not using rotary input, the only option you have at your disposal is to employ an imbalanced lateral supplimental force. I know this can be done, and I know how. I use it myself at times. But I also know that this technique, like all others, carries its own unique shortcomings.
By admonishing rotary as a means of supplimenting carving you are the one who's limiting appoaches. Anyone who faithfully follows this anti-rotary philosophy will never suceed in racing, at any level. Show me a video of Diana negotiating a tight, steep section of a race course and I'll show you her extensive use of rotary. You know this. Shame on you.