This may have been said here before, but thought I'd add too it! I've never been a big fan of the PSIA technique, it seems to make skiing more complicated than it needs to be, not to mention looks robotic - I'm sure you know what I mean. Should there be more concern for "consistent edge angles" and "consistent stance width," or for stronger, dynamic, (human) SKIING? After learning to ski on 205cm slalom skis my father had to revamp his skiing when shaped skis came out (he was still doing alll the work). He got his instruction through PSIA and honestly, his head near exploded from their instruction.
I'm looking forward to reading your book and working towards skiing like Harb. Keep up the great skiing!
Dont want to cause any trouble in the PSIA/PTMS world, just saying I think one makes more sense than the other. My measly 2 cents. Let's go skiing!