noobSkier wrote:I used to build data collection systems for commercial clients and scientific applications before I started my business. Wrote a few android apps for enterprise, no iOS experience unfortunately...but I could probably pick it up pretty quickly. From a programming standpoint, it's pretty simple to get the hardware up and running...quality phone application would take longer.
Carv is a bit intrusive with the force sensor in a footbed, so I don't see myself using it for that reason alone. I also don't trust their algorithms, like how are they determining rotation and turn symmetry? For me, angles wouldn't be that useful, and I don't see how that could be accurate. My idea is to use it primarily to make sure I'm weighing the outside ski, keeping the inside ski light, and making sure forces are symmetrical from turn to turn. You could easily write an algorithm to infer arc beginning/end from sensor data. I see that Carv is averaging everything out...would be cool to look at individual arcs too.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests