PeteJE wrote:I was hoping there is some harmony between these two methods of instruction as opposed to poor skills or habits that must be broken / relearned.
HeluvaSkier wrote:PeteJE wrote:I was hoping there is some harmony between these two methods of instruction as opposed to poor skills or habits that must be broken / relearned.
I think you will find there are some things to un-learn. By working through book 1 you are already on the right track.
PeteJE wrote:This part I don't quite understand, but you don't know what you don't know, lol. It seems to me that Lito emrbaces and teaches from the feet up and presents one footed balance, the stance that flows from that, and the phantom move fron the get go.
suxsusy wrote:I'm the last one who could speak about that because i'm unexpert, but i've tried 40 years the traditional system (steering, twisting, up movement to lighten the skis and turn) having not good reward.
In my opinion PMTS is unique and it has got nothing in common with other systems.
For what i read, everything is different from the movements to the time to do those real movements, the pole planting, the
position and distance of the skis.
I think in PMTS there's no space for something else. It should work perfectly so as it is
One has to chose : PMTS or not-PMTS
Bye
Susy
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests