Rick wrote: . . . as soon as counter movements are introduced a forward flexion (of the waist) component must be introduced to optimize the balance enhancing effects of counterbalancing movements.
Rick, We are on exactly the same page here. This is one big reason to counter move.
SkierSynergy-from first post wrote:Lastly, it provides greater counter balancing effect then by using counter balancing alone. By adding counter acting, the upper body can stay upright more easily because the skier can recruit the muscles in front of the stomach and bend forward at the waist (forward in relation to the direction of the hips) rather than just isolating a lateral muscles and bending involved in counter balancing alone.
With no counter acting, getting the upper body back over the skis (the counter balancing) involves mainly the obliques. As counter acting is added the movement involves more muscles in the front of the torso. Yes this is much easier and more effective at high edge angles.
As far as the specific movements I am in agreement.
One issue that I always have with these discussions is that they try to describe these movements at the highest level without much discussion of how to get there. I think this was a big issue with the "Inside Leg Extension" thread . That is why I offered up a few practical and focused exercises for counter balance (when no counter movement is present).
I'll try to throw out some practical exercises later for counter movement in specific, as well as, some basic tasks to integrate the two into your skiing. However, I will ask that others who are working on these movements share their experiences and what they do as exercises, drills, etc.