Mac wrote:But the Icon TT never quite measured up to those expectations, at least IMO.
Smackboy1 wrote:For me, I prefer around 2-3 cm fore of the factory mark.
h.harb wrote:Hard to figure out, how about some video of you skiing skis you don't like, that PMTS experts like, and then we will be able to tell you why yo don't like them?
Max_501 wrote:Smackboy1 wrote:For me, I prefer around 2-3 cm fore of the factory mark.
3cm? What ski is that on?
Smackboy1 wrote:Same ski everybody else has been discussing for the past 3 pages: Head Icon TT80 a.k.a. Head Icon TT800.
Skiasaurus Rex wrote:1. No one actually said they didn't like the icontt did they? I think there was some discussion about their durability or going dead too soon. FWIW, for those that like the IconTT, check out another unfortunately discontinued model: The Hart Phoenix. VERY SIMILAR SKI: 66mm waist, modest sidecut, tapered tail, very even, smooth flex. Good on hardpack and moguls. If you are ebay or craigslist shopping for a ski like the IconTT, keep the Phoenix in mind.
Skiasaurus Rex wrote:2. Back to the actually thread…I am surprised there isn't a greater buzz about the Supershape Rally on this forum. After seeing HA's review and finally borrowing an acquaintance's for 5-6 runs on firm groomers, I'd think this would be at the top of the list for many around here. Why isn't it? Is it a good ski? Or, do folks regard it highly but just haven' talked about it much?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests