zuschauer wrote:John, I have a pair of Head Mojo's here (previous iteration of the R&R) and an Icelantic SKNY Shaman. They don't feel any stiffer than the HEADS (but in the shop, who knows?)
We'll just have to demo. I am liking the idea of a 15m radius in the 173. Head R& R =17+ radius in a 173
Richard
theorist wrote:Any thoughts on the pintails, e.g. the Dynastar Cham 97 (133-97-113, 16m@178) and Stockli Y85 (136-85-110, 15.6m@177)? The Cham, which has two layers of titinal, is available in a lighter, softer HM ("high mountain") version that foregoes the metal. It's also available in 87, 107 and 127 widths.
theorist wrote:In deep, heavy snow (like one typically finds in the Sierras and Europe), does the tail width of a wide ski, combined with resistance from the snow, make brush carving challenging -- particularly on very steep terrain, where you might want to make short, quick turns?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests