Look when it comes to the primary movements they are well articulated in the instructors manual. An instructors manual is a little more like a text book than something like "Anyone can be an Expert".
One of the things I am starting to like about PMTS is the cert process is directly on whether you have master of the primary movements and have a student centered approach at that level. If you have a green student and a green PMTS instructor, that instructor should be as good as he/she is a teacher. This is not necessarily true with a PSIA level 1 or II intructor. The standards there are on grasp of the core concepts and general ability to follow the teaching model. The level of performance is much wider for acceptability.
Its the Micky D approach. Anyone can make a hamburger but how many can make it the same every time. Do the Micky D approach produces good intructors at the lower levels much faster. With the aveage instructor in the business for only 2-3 years, that is a very good thing.
Now this back and forth comparison to PSIA and PSIA bashing is not healthy for PMTS. It alienates the very dedicated people who have the wherewithall to embrace PMTS, break down the barriers and take this to the market.